Tampa Bay Lightning vs Utah Mammoth Prediction - 11/2/2025
Updated July 30, 2026
The Tampa Bay Lightning and Utah Mammoth will meet in the NHL on Sunday afternoon. Utah is off to a great start to the season and they will look to stay unbeaten at home with a win in this contest. But they will need to beat a streaking Lightning team in order to accomplish that. Before the puck drops in Salt Lake City, continue reading to get my Lightning vs Mammoth prediction for Sunday.
Tampa Bay’s Andrei Vasilevskiy comes into this game with a 3-3-2 record. He has a 2.61 GAA and a .899 save percentage and will try to shut down the Mammoth here. Utah’s Karel Vejmelka has a slightly worse GAA than Vasilevskiy at 2.75, but he also has a 6-2-0 record thanks to the support he's received from the team around him.
Player | Stat | Pick |
|---|---|---|
Anthony Cirelli (Tampa Bay) | Goals | Over 0.5 |
Nikita Kucherov (Tampa Bay) | Assists | Over 0.5 |
Anthony Cirelli (Tampa Bay) | Points | Over 0.5 |
Nick Schmaltz (Utah) | Goals | Over 0.5 |
Score Projection: Utah Mammoth 4 – Tampa Bay Lightning 3
Win Probability: Utah 56%, Tampa Bay 44%
We should see a close game between these two teams that are playing at a very high level entering Sunday afternoon. The Mammoth are perfect at home, while the Lightning are on fire of late. But I'll take the Mammoth to win this game on home ice and to continue their perfect start on home ice, as I'm expecting a great game from Schmaltz once again to lead them.
Jay Sanin is the GM and Head of Sports at ATS.io. He has been writing about sports gambling since 2013, handicapping tens of thousands of sporting events. He plays sides and totals aggressively across most sports and is more selective in player prop markets. He does his own modeling across most sports, and his family is jealous of how much time he spends on his precious spreadsheets.
Affiliate Disclosure
ATS.io uses affiliate links. If you sign up through a link on this page, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. Rankings are based on hands-on testing and published criteria, and affiliate relationships do not determine placement.
